Learn what Complementary & Alternative Medicine (CAM) includes, from acupuncture and Ayurveda to supplements and mind–body therapies. Explore the benefits, risks, cultural roots, and how to choose safe, reputable CAM practitioners.

Within a week, I attended two events on the very opposite ends of the nutrition spectrum: one was a lecture featuring science-based evidence regarding the health effects of ultra-processed foods and the other was a holistic health and wellness expo where speakers presented on topics like hormonal health and taking unconventional approaches to chronic conditions (I did not come across any other Registered Dietitians at the latter).

The discussions at both of these events got me thinking about my own pursuits and beliefs within the dietetics field. I started learning about nutrition in a very “food-as-medicine” way about 20 years ago when I was suffering from many gastrointestinal issues. Ironically, for as many specialists I went to see, not once was I referred to a Registered Dietitian. When I landed on the campus of Lehman College in 2013, I started learning about the biochemical make-up of the human body and our cells. While both dietetic students and nursing students enrolled in many of the same science classes, the learning for dietetic students concentrated on nutrition effects on the body functions (both positive and negative) and medical nutrition therapy, while nursing students learned more about pharmacology, surgery, and other therapeutic measures in managing disease.

Within the field of nutrition, at least for those of who are members of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, lie many dietetic practice groups. At the beginning of my career, one in particular that appealed to my interest in both the science and more holistic sides of my brain was the Dietitians in Integrative and Functional Medicine (DIFM) whose core philosophy centers around a holistic, personalized approach to health and healing, and whose members integrate a variety of nutrition therapies including whole foods, tailored supplements, and mind-body modalities in their clinical practices. Over time, I came to learn that there was a lot of friction among dietitians and other healthcare providers when it came to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), since many of these practices didn’t grow out of the same scientific tradition as modern Western healthcare, and I slowly lost my connection to the more holistic approaches.

Lately, though, I’ve started to notice an increase prevalence and interest in CAM modalities, whether through the MAHA movement or social media, so I thought it would dive back into this topic and explore common CAM practices, discuss the growing body of research around them, and share practical guidance for safe, informed use.

Why CAM Is Everywhere Right Now

Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is no longer a fringe category It’s a growing landscape of healing approaches that many of us have encountered through social media, TikTok influencers, wellness retreats, or conversations with friends who swear by a particular herb or practice. But with that growing popularity comes a lot of confusion about what CAM actually includes, why people are drawn to it, and where it fits alongside conventional medical care.

CAM is often talked about as a single umbrella, but in reality it ranges from evidence-backed, mind–body practices to cultural healing traditions to highly speculative therapies [1]. At its core, CAM is divided into a few categories that help clarify what’s being used and how. Complementary therapies are practices used alongside conventional medicine, like acupuncture for chemotherapy-induced nausea or meditation to support anxiety treatment. Alternative therapies are used instead of conventional care and may carry more significant risks, especially for serious conditions, because many have not been proven safe or effective [2]. Integrative medicine, meanwhile, blends conventional and complementary approaches in a coordinated, evidence-informed way under trained clinical guidance. One branch of integrative care, functional medicine, takes a systems-based approach focused on root causes and long-term prevention, often using specialized testing and personalized nutrition strategies [3]. These distinctions matter because they influence safety, expectations, and the type of training required to practice each modality responsibly.

Many individuals turn to CAM not because they reject conventional medicine, but because they want a more holistic view of their health—one that considers stress, sleep, diet, daily habits, identity, and meaning. Understanding this broader context helps us move past the “Is it real or fake?” debate and toward a more nuanced question: How can we evaluate CAM with clarity, curiosity, and safety in mind?

The Cultural and Historical Roots Behind Modern Practices

It’s easy to assume that Western medicine has always used the evidence-based frameworks we rely on today, but medical history tells a different story.

Long before we had randomized controlled trials (RCTs), healing systems around the world—including early Western medicine—were grounded in observation, philosophy, and lived experience [4]. Their frameworks revolve around balance, energy flow, constitution, environment, and the relationship between mind and body. For example, the ancient Theory of the Four Humors shaped the earliest Western medical thinking, and although it has been scientifically discarded, its emphasis on balance influenced global healing traditions for centuries [5].

Practices like Ayurveda categorize individuals into dosha types, each with dietary and lifestyle strategies meant to restore equilibrium, while TCM uses concepts like qi, yin–yang, and the Five Elements to explain health patterns [6,7]. Whether or not these systems align with modern scientific models, millions of people still find them meaningful—and understanding that historical context helps us talk about CAM without dismissiveness or over-enthusiasm.

Different Approaches, Different Expectations

The draw of CAM is often deeply personal. (I know it was for me when I first started dealing with some intense gastrointestinal issues in my late twenties and conventional approaches weren’t cutting it.) Many people seek therapies that reflect a more holistic view of health, one that accounts for stress, emotional wellbeing, daily habits, and the complex interplay of lifestyle factors. Others find comfort in approaches that align with their cultural background, spiritual beliefs, or desire for empowerment in their healing journey. CAM providers often spend more time with clients, offering personalized guidance and a sense of partnership that can feel lacking in busy clinical settings [8]. At the same time, it’s important to remember that “natural” does not automatically mean “safe,” and guidance from untrained or non-credentialed practitioners can carry meaningful risks [9]. Understanding these motivations helps us approach CAM with both empathy and a commitment to evidence-based decision-making.

One of the biggest misunderstandings about CAM is the belief that all healing systems must be validated by the same type of evidence to be considered legitimate [10]. Western medicine relies on controlled trials, peer-reviewed research, and standardized methods, all tools that have transformed health outcomes and remain essential for evaluating safety and effectiveness. CAM traditions, on the other hand, often come from practice-based evidence, meaning decades or centuries of patient experience, community use, and practitioner observation [11,12]. This doesn’t automatically prove that a therapy works, but it helps explain why CAM traditions persist even when they don’t fit neatly into biochemical or reductionist medical models. The tension between these systems can lead to mistrust on both sides, but a balanced view acknowledges that science can benefit from cultural context, and traditions can benefit from scientific scrutiny [13].

Safety First: How to Evaluate Claims and Find Credible Information

Not all CAM therapies carry the same level of evidence or risk, which is why safety and critical thinking should always come first. Many practices—such as meditation, yoga, tai chi, and acupuncture—have substantial research supporting their use for stress reduction, chronic pain, or emotional wellbeing [14]. Others, like certain herbal supplements, detox protocols, or energy-based therapies, vary widely in quality, dosing, and potential for harm [15].

Supplements in particular can interact with medications (including anticoagulants, chemotherapy agents, and SSRIs), and because they aren’t regulated like prescription drugs, potency and purity can differ significantly between products. Red flags include any therapy that claims to cure serious disease, discourages conventional treatment, calls itself “secret,” or requires costly long-term commitments [16]. A responsible CAM provider will be transparent about their training, work within their scope, and encourage communication with your healthcare team.

Reliable information is essential when exploring CAM, especially in a digital landscape full of bold claims and persuasive testimonials. Authoritative sources such as the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), PubMed, Natural Medicines, and Cochrane Reviews provide research-based guidance on specific therapies. These platforms summarize what is known, what remains unclear, and where risks may outweigh benefits [17]. They also highlight issues like supplement quality, contamination, and interactions—topics that can be overlooked on social media or influencer-driven wellness platforms. A healthy level of skepticism is protective: ask about scientific support, credentialing, safety protocols, and whether a therapy could interfere with medical care. With the right tools, you can be informed rather than intimidated [18].

A Balanced, Empowered Approach

The goal of exploring CAM isn’t to choose a side between Western and alternative medicine. It’s to recognize that health is multifaceted and that different approaches can offer value when used thoughtfully, safely, and collaboratively.

The most empowered patients are those who ask questions, understand both benefits and limitations, and communicate openly with their providers, especially when considering supplements or modalities outside conventional care [19]. No matter where you land on the spectrum of curiosity or skepticism, safety should always be the starting point.

A trustworthy CAM practitioner is transparent about training, willing to coordinate with your healthcare team, and clear about when their modality should not be used. For example, when you engage with a CAM practitioner, be sure to ask the following:

1. What training have you completed?
2. Are you licensed or certified? If so, by whom?
3. How long was your training program and did it include supervised practice?
4. What is your scope of practice?
5. How do you handle safety concerns, medical red flags, or referrals?
6. Do you communicate and coordinate with my healthcare team?
7. How do you evaluate whether a therapy is working?

CAM may resonate with you because it aligns with your cultural background, or feels like a missing puzzle piece in your wellness journey because it offers a more holistic lens. Whatever your motivation, your choices deserve to be informed and grounded in evidence, safety, and respect for both science and tradition. The goal is not to dismiss CAM outright or embrace it uncritically, but to navigate it with clarity so that your choices truly support your whole health, not just the trending health advice of the moment.

And if you’re exploring supplements or herbs, resources like NCCIH, PubMed, Natural Medicines, or Cochrane Reviews can help you evaluate what’s known…and what isn’t.

Did you miss our live CAM webinar? Don’t worry! You’ll find the recording uploaded to the DishWithDinaTV webinar playlist starting mid-February 2026.

References

1. Assessing the Effectiveness of Complementary & Alternative Medicine. (n.d.). https://www.med.unc.edu/phyrehab/pim/wp-content/uploads/sites/615/2018/03/Effectiveness.pdf
2. Fischer, F. H., Lewith, G., Witt, C. M., Linde, K., von Ammon, K., Cardini, F., Falkenberg, T., Fønnebø, V., Johannessen, H., Reiter, B., Uehleke, B., Weidenhammer, W., & Brinkhaus, B. (2014). High prevalence but limited evidence in complementary and alternative medicine: guidelines for future research. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-46
3. Finnell, J. S., Snider, P., Myers, S. P., & Zeff, J. (2019). A Hierarchy of Healing: Origins of the Therapeutic Order and Implications for Research. Integrative Medicine: A Clinician’s Journal, 18(3), 54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7217399/
4. 5 Elements & Cycles online course. (2025). Qifoodtherapy.com. https://www.qifoodtherapy.com/cycles
5. Brander, E. (2020, October 30). Humoralism and the seasons. Becker Medical Library. https://becker.wustl.edu/news/humoralism-and-the-seasons/
6. Banerjee, S., Debnath, P., & Debnath, P. K. (2015). Ayurnutrigenomics: Ayurveda-inspired personalized nutrition from inception to evidence. Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine, 5(4), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2014.12.009
7. Gaur, R. (2024). A brief history: Traditional Chinese medicinal system. Pharmacological Research – Modern Chinese Medicine, 10, 100387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prmcm.2024.100387
8. Cochrane Reviews related to Complementary Medicine | Cochrane Complementary Medicine. (2024). Cochrane.org. https://cam.cochrane.org/cochrane-reviews-related-complementary-medicine
9. Johnson, A., Roberts, L., & Elkins, G. (2019). Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Menopause. Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine, 24(24), 2515690X1982938. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515690×19829380
10. (2025). Nationalacademies.org. https://www.nationalacademies.org/read/11182/chapter/8
11. ‌Engle, R. L., Mohr, D. C., Holmes, S. K., Seibert, M. N., Afable, M., Leyson, J., & Meterko, M. (2021). Evidence-based Practice and patient-centered care: Doing Both Well. Health Care Management Review, 46(3), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000254
12. ‌What Is Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing? | HPU Online. (n.d.). Online.hpu.edu. https://online.hpu.edu/blog/evidence-based-practice-in-nursing
13. Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges. (2016). What is Naturopathic Medicine? Learn More Now with AANMC. AANMC. https://aanmc.org/naturopathic-medicine/
14. Dubey, A., & Muley, P. A. (2023). Meditation: A Promising Approach for Alleviating Chronic Pain. Cureus, 15(11), e49244. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.49244
15. ‌Hassen, G., Belete, G., Carrera, K. G., Iriowen, R. O., Araya, H., Alemu, T., Solomon, N., Bam, D. S., Nicola, S. M., Araya, M. E., Debele, T., Zouetr, M., & Jain, N. (2022). Clinical Implications of Herbal Supplements in Conventional Medical Practice: A US Perspective. Cureus, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26893
16. ‌Tweedy, J. (2019, September 17). First rule of complementary therapy? Recognise “red flags” that indicate a serious medical problem – College of Medicine and Integrated Health. College of Medicine and Integrated Health – Changing the Conversation about Health. https://collegeofmedicine.org.uk/first-rule-of-complementary-therapy-recognise-the-red-flags-that-indicate-a-serious-medical-problem/
17. ‌Johns Hopkins Medicine. (2024). Types of complementary and alternative medicine. Johns Hopkins Medicine Health Library. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/types-of-complementary-and-alternative-medicine
18. Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine: SAGE Journals. (2018). SAGE Journals. https://journals.sagepub.com/home/chp
19. Ventola, C. L. (2010). Current Issues Regarding Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in the United States: Part 2: Regulatory and Safety Concerns and Proposed Governmental Policy Changes with Respect to Dietary Supplements. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 35(9), 514. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2957745/